"The record companies basically bought themselves a huge amount of bad publicity, a few settlements and no real impact on file-sharing." "The individual lawsuits were unbelievably counterproductive," said Christopher Jon Sprigman, co-author of the Knockoff Economy. Since then, it has been in talks with Internet Service Providers in an effort to create a new strategy to abet piracy. The group adjusted its anti-piracy strategy in 2008 and stopped suing individuals. Most of those cases were settled out of court or dismissed – Thomas-Rasset's case being one of the few exceptions. The RIAA sued more than 18,000 people for illegally sharing music in the mid-2000s. Her lawyer Kiwi Camara said in an email they would try to take the case to the US supreme court. They initially offered a $4,500 settlement which Thomas-Rasset did not accept.Ĭourt papers show Thomas-Rasset testified she had not heard of KaZaA prior to her case and after being found guilty, she filed a motion that any statutory damage awards would be unconstitutional in her case. The RIAA accused her of downloading and distributing more than 1,700 music files on file-sharing site KaZaA, but took legal action on 24 works for efficiency.
The trade group filed their first complaint against Thomas-Rasset in 2006 on behalf of six record labels and has been embroiled in a legal battle with her ever since.
"We are pleased with the appellate court's decision and look forward to putting this case behind us," the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) said in a statement.
0 kommentar(er)
